WikiLeaks continues to tease the public with the alleged upcoming exposure of new explosive information. Apparently, it may have something to do with Hillary Clinton.
"WikiLeaks asked what is Vault 7, where is Vault 7, when is Vault 7. While the world waits for the 'why' and 'who', we assume that the answer as to 'when' is on February 19," a video released by Anonymous Scandinavia on Twitter says.
Here's our final hint concerning the #WikiLeaks teasers with reference to https://t.co/kqE3I0FZl7
— AnonymousScandinavia (@AnonScan) February 6, 2017
and various🎬in our entire feed.#Vault7 ⤵ pic.twitter.com/kkfcQOPzQ3
"What do Hillary Clinton, Google and WikiLeaks have to do with each other?… Is Hillary Clinton going to be prosecuted?" the video asks.
Zero Hedge reported Wednesday that WikiLeaks, an international non-profit organization that publishes news leaks and classified information has started releasing cryptic questions about the mysterious "Vault 7" on Twitter from February 4, 2017.
Every day the organization posted a question on Twitter with an image attached: "What, Where, When, Who, Why and How did WikiLeaks Acquire Vault 7?"
What is #Vault7? pic.twitter.com/PrjBU0LSAF
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 4, 2017
How did #Vault7 make its way to WikiLeaks? pic.twitter.com/9lbEPhkR6w
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 9, 2017
The riddle has prompted a lively debate among social media platform users. One of the assumptions was connected with the fact that on February 4 the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released "Part 6" of Hillary Clinton's email investigation documents.
Full text: FBI quietly releases part 6 of its Hillary Clinton investigation #FBIFriday PDF: https://t.co/JaERLUx70M
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) February 4, 2017
Back in March 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for over 30,000 emails and email attachments from Hillary Clinton's private email server. The documents span from June 30, 2010 to August 12, 2014.
Furthermore, in October and November the organization released thousands of emails belonging to Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta and the second part of DNC emails.
The hack was groundlessly blamed on Russia by then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, although no evidence was presented to confirm these claims. Julian Assange denied that Moscow could have had a hand in it.
In an exclusive interview with Sputnik former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray revealed in early November that the Podesta and DNC emails were not leaked by Russian hackers, but by a Washington insider.
"The source of these emails and leaks has nothing to do with Russia at all. I discovered what the source was when I attended the Sam Adam's whistleblower award in Washington. The source of these emails comes from within official circles in Washington DC. You should look to Washington not to Moscow," former British ambassador told Sputnik.
Some observers argue that the leak could have been the reason behind Hillary Clinton's resounding defeat in the 2016 presidential election.
The question then arises how an upcoming disclosure by WikiLeaks may affect the former Democratic presidential nominee.
